Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duane DaRock Ramos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 22:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Duane DaRock Ramos

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial support. A google search reveals no in-depth reporting, only a couple of interviews, PR releases, and single line mentions. reddogsix (talk) 21:35, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:48, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:48, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:24, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A minor rapper and music producer. As musician himself he fails WP:MUSICBIO in every criteria. No chart position, no significant radio airing, no awards, nothing. For his producer work, the article tries to namedrop some notable rappers; those collaborations have indeed happened it seems, but being producer for a couple of songs which are somehow associated with a few more well known musicians is not a strong argument for notability. Notability does not derive from association. He also fails WP:GNG generally. In-depth coverage of his person does not seem to exist, I could only find a couple of mentions of him in non-RS, there doesn't seem to be much on him out there. The article should therefore bet deleted due a lack of RS. Additionally this also seems to be a promotional piece, as the creator himself wrote on the talkpage that he personally works with the subject in question. Dead Mary (talk) 18:04, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.